neurologist

Post

Posts tagged as "neurologist"

Comments   |   Brain Injury

Do you have the Right Brain Injury Lawyer?

I first wrote the an essay on this topic in 1997, and my list has remained mostly unchanged since: http://tbilaw.com/essays/choiceoflawyer.html I still think these questions which are listed below are good questions to start with. But of course, one could argue that those questions were self serving then, as I of course fit all such ...

Comments   |   Brain Injury

Severe Versus Mild Prognosis

I got this email exchange this week, about something I wrote more than a decade ago: Is this a typo? http://www.waiting.com/recoveryexpect.html A so-called “mild” brain injury may result in substantial deficits which may affect a person’s life permanently, while a person who has suffered a “severe” brain injury may be able to return to a ...

Comments   |   Brain Injury

Venting at Emergency Room Doctors

Is it really so unreasonable to expect someone who is working in an Emergency Room, to know a few simple things about concussion and amnesia. Here is what it says in the medical record I am reviewing now, a record from an emergency room, three days post accident: “This patient was involved in an accident ...

Comments   |   Brain Injury

No Justice without Documentation of Injury

“It isn’t fair, I got hurt, what do you mean you don’t want my case?” I wish I could help everyone. I feel bad when I can’t. A million concussions a year in this country, conservatively 150,000 people disabled as a result. That would make me a very busy man. I am not that busy. ...

Comments   |   Brain Injury

From a Former Client

Editor’s note: Cindy is an amazing person, whose life was terribly changed by a an accident she suffered. She was brilliant, and still is one of the most creative and interesting thinkers I know. Yet: I’ve been following this discussion regarding terminology and it has generated a lot of thoughts for me. I have problems ...

1 comment   |   Brain Injury

Footprints of Pathology

“No objective evidence of injury.” The defense argument that there is “no objective evidence of injury” is so predictable in every brain injury case, it is a tactic I try to attack from all angles. Imaging studies are not our only objective findings in medicine. We also accept the “footprint of pathology” signs as objective. ...

Comments   |   Brain Injury

How Doctors Don’t Think About Brain Damage

Every day, I encounter another example, either in the calls we get from our websites, or in the news media, or some where else, as to how Doctors don’t ever consider the potential for brain damage in the differential diagnosis. While it isn’t a real world example, this one is kind of fun to make ...

Comments   |   Brain Injury

Brain Damage or Is it Mild Head Injury or what?

I have dealt with the semantics of what to call someone who suffered brain damage after an accident or injury as long as I have been represented such individuals. When I first started, there was an organization called the NHIF, National Head Injury Foundation. Then it was deemed inaccurate, or politically correct or something, and ...

Comments   |   Brain Injury

Lawyer: How to Interact with your Brain Damaged Client

Editors Note: Two days ago, my paralegal Jayne wrote a Blog on how potential clients should interact with a law firm when they are trying to get them to take their case. I then asked a former client to write the counterpoint to Jayne’s Blog: how she thought a law firm should interact with a ...

1 comment   |   Brain Injury

Korean Boxer Death – Coma Wasn’t Immediate

The death of Korean boxer Choi Yo-sam eight days after he fell into a coma, after winning his last fight is significant, not just because of the barbarity of allowing the sport of Boxing to exist. It is also significant because it is the ultimate demonstration that a person does not have to suffer an ...

Disclaimer:

The materials on this World Wide Web site are provided purely for informational purposes and are not legal advice. These materials are intended, but not promised or guaranteed, to be correct, complete, and current. This web site is not intended to be a source of advertising, solicitation or legal advice. Therefore, the reader should not consider this information an invitation for an attorney-client relationship. Readers should not act or rely upon any information contained in this World Wide Web site and should always seek the advice of competent counsel.

The owner of this web site is a law firm, the Johnson Law Office which organized the Brain Injury Law Group. The Johnson Law Office is licensed to practice in the States of Wisconsin , Illinois and Michigan. The Brain Injury Law Group does not wish to represent anyone desiring representation based upon their viewing any portion of this World Wide Web site that fails to comply with all legal and ethical rules in such individuals state. While not intended to do so, but in a good faith effort to comply with all rules and regulation which may be applicable to it, the Brain Injury Law Group hereby informs readers that this site may be construed as advertising and promotional materials. The Brain Injury Law Group makes no representation that it can obtain the same results as reported in this web site in other legal matters.

The transmission of an e-mail request for information does not create an attorney-client relationship. If you are a client, remember that e-mail may not be secure.

WE BELIEVE THAT THE FAR PREFERRED METHOD FOR YOU TO CONTACT US IS BY PHONE AT 800-992-9447.

All content and images are copyright protected, all rights reserved by Attorney S. Johnson, Jr. ©1997 - 2012.